Cases 1 - 10 of 192
Strahan v. Roughead, et al
as 14-1635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY ROUGHEAD, Chief of Naval Operations, United States Navy, ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary, Department of Defense and DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary, Department of Navy
Interested Party:
FISH & RICHARDSON
Strahan v. Greenert, et al
as 13-2219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY ROUGHEAD, Chief of Naval Operations, United States Navy, ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary, Department of Defense and DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary, Department of the Navy
Interested Party:
FISH & RICHARDSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-16208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Strahan v. Roughead, et al
as 13-1136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY ROUGHEAD, Chief of Naval Operations, United States Navy, ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary, Department of Defense and DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary, Department of the Navy
Interested Party:
FISH & RICHARDSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-55125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
