Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Barber v. Preferred Credit Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01176
Plaintiff:
Donald Joe Barber
Defendant:
Preferred Credit Inc, Easy Rest Adjustable Sleep System and Christopher Jarrot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Donald Barber v. State of Alabama, et al
as 21-10477
Defendant / Appellee:
HURST TOWING AND RECOVERY INC, BRANDON LEDLOW, JEFFERSON COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD JOE BARBER
In re: Donald Barber
as 20-13709
Petitioner:
In re: DONALD JOE BARBER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Barber v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2020cv00659
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Hurst Towing Inc, Mark Pettway and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Joe Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Barber v. Internal Revenue Service, et al
as 17-12174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD JOE BARBER, All of "We the People" of the republic states
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, JOHN KOSKINEN, REBECCA KLINE and others
Donald Barber v. Adam Unknown, et al
as 17-11146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD JOE BARBER
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAM UNKNOWN and POTTER
Barber v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2017cv00284
Plaintiff:
Donald Joe Barber
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, John Koskinen, Rebecca Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Barber v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2016cv01321
Plaintiff:
Donald Joe Barber
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, John Koskinen, Rebecca Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2016cv01247
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Maurice Garrett, Paul Edward Trull, Jr, Kimberly Dawn Trull and others
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, John Koskinen, Rebecca Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Miorania et al
as 5:2015cv01664
Plaintiff:
Donald Joe Barber
Defendant:
Adam Unknown, Potter and Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
