Cases 1 - 10 of 13
May v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Donald May
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
May v. USA
as 3:2019cv00369
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Donald May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cece et al v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2016cv10410
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cece , Jefffrey Chesney , Neil Donahue and others
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Robert Ficano and Warren Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2011cv00433
Plaintiff:
Donald Mays
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kudela et al
as 1:2010cv00999
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C. Kudela , Thomas C. Cowan , Thomas F. Denk and others
Defendant:
James J Kocon, Kocon Masonry L.L.C., Jim Kocon Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Kudela et al v. RAF Masonry Restorations, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02070
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C. Kudela, Thomas C. Cowan, Thomas F. Denk and others
Defendant:
RAF Masonry Restorations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Barber et al v. Royal Stone Erectors, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00024
Plaintiff:
James Barber, Thomas F. Denk, Rick J. Semersky, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Royal Stone Erectors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barber et al v. Gallagher Masonry, Inc.
as 5:2008cv01417
Plaintiff:
James Barber, James Barber, Thomas F. Denk and others
Defendant:
Gallagher Masonry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barber et al v. Onex Construction, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01413
Plaintiff:
James Barber, James Barber, Thomas F. Denk and others
Defendant:
Onex Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barber et al v. Martina Marble Company
as 1:2008cv01172
Plaintiff:
James Barber, James Barber, Thomas F. Denk and others
Defendant:
Martina Marble Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
