Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Robert Sarvis v. Charles Judd
as 15-1162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT C. SARVIS
Plaintiff:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA, WILLIAM HAMMER, JEFFREY CARSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. JUDD, in his individual and official capacities as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, DONALD PALMER, in his individual and official capacities as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections and KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, in her individual and official capacities as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections
Sarvis et al v. Judd et al
as 3:2014cv00479
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Sarvis , Libertarian Party of Virginia , William Hammer and others
Defendant:
Charles E. Judd , Donald Palmer and Kimberly T. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Project Vote/Voting for Amer. v. Elisa Long
as 12-2146
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PROJECT VOTE/VOTING FOR AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
ELISA LONG, in her official capacity as General Registrar of Norfolk, Virginia
Defendant:
DONALD PALMER, in his official capacity as Secretary, State Board of Elections
Project Vote/Voting for Amer. v. Donald Palmer
as 12-2142
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PROJECT VOTE/VOTING FOR AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD PALMER, in his official capacity as Secretary, State Board of Elections
Defendant:
ELISA LONG, in her official capacity as General Registrar of Norfolk, Virginia
Harvey et al v. Showalter et al
as 3:2012cv00650
Plaintiff:
L. Shirley Harvey and Christopher Dorsey
Defendant:
Jane Kirk Showalter , George William Thomas , Cecelia Dabney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Parker v. Euille et al
as 1:2012cv00548
Plaintiff:
Ray Elbert Parker
Defendant:
William D. Euille , Gregory A. Whirley , Ray LaHood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newt Gingrich v. Charles Judd
as 12-1068
Plaintiff:
RICK PERRY
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
RICK SANTORUM and JON HUNTSMAN
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEWT GINGRICH
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. JUDD, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and DONALD PALMER, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity
Defendant:
PAT MULLINS, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia and JONATHON ALDEN MOSELEY
Rick Perry v. Charles Judd
as 12-1067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICK PERRY
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
NEWT GINGRICH, RICK SANTORUM and JON HUNTSMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. JUDD, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and DONALD PALMER, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity
Defendant:
PAT MULLINS, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia and JONATHON ALDEN MOSELEY
Rick Perry v. Charles Judd
as 12-1042
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICK PERRY
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEWT GINGRICH, RICK SANTORUM and JON HUNTSMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. JUDD, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and DONALD PALMER, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity
Defendant:
PAT MULLINS, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia
Rick Perry v. Charles Judd
as 12-1047
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICK PERRY
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEWT GINGRICH, RICK SANTORUM and JON HUNTSMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. JUDD, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and DONALD PALMER, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity
Defendant:
PAT MULLINS, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
