Cases 1 - 10 of 258
Bolden v. Raoul et al
as 4:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Donnell Bolden
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Heidi Epperson, Elaine Bochenek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Donnell Devonte Sanders
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Donnell v Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2023cv15733
Plaintiff:
Carol Donnell
Defendant:
WALMART INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bolden v. Hernandez et al
as 4:2023cv04194
Plaintiff:
Donnell Bolden
Defendant:
Nicole Hernandez, Illinois Department of Human Services, Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden v. Bochenek et al
as 4:2023cv04192
Plaintiff:
Donnell Bolden
Defendant:
Elaine Bochenek, Nicole Hernandez, Illinois Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackey v. Werlich et al
as 3:2023cv03412
Plaintiff:
Muriel Mackey
Defendant:
Thomas Werlich, Faisal Ahmed, N Brown, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03369
Plaintiff:
Donnelle Thurman
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills and Tact Team Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden v. Miller et al
as 4:2023cv04171
Plaintiff:
Donnell Bolden
Defendant:
Sarah Miller, Illinois Department of Human Services, Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. Revlon, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv13165
Plaintiff:
Donnell Joseph
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
