Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Price v. St. Joseph County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jarron Donnell Price
Defendant:
St. Joseph County Jail and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. St. Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jarron Donnell Price
Defendant:
St. Joseph County Jail and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. GTL
as 1:2022cv02125
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Defendant:
GTL, THE STATE OF INDIANA and THE INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. HANLON
as 1:2022cv02058
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Defendant:
JAMES PATRICK HANLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Donnell M. Phillips
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HOLMES v. EMKES
as 1:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Defendant:
CYNTHIA SUE EMKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOLMES v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv01049
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Neal
as 3:2022cv00205
Petitioner:
Mr. Donnell Wilson and Donnell Wilson
Respondent:
Mr. Ron Neal and Ron Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOLMES v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00037
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and ELECTORATES
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLMES v. APPEAL COURTS et al
as 1:2020cv00271
Defendant:
SARA EVANS BARKER, TYANA WALTON PRATT, SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
