Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Omnity Consulting, LLC v. Doordash, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Omnity Consulting, LLC dba Harlem Shake (West 124th Street) and Omnity Consulting, LLC individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Harlem Shake (West 124th Street)
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1361
Karout v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2023cv06148
Plaintiff:
Sharbell Karout
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rodgers et al v. Doordash Inc
as 3:2023cv05564
Plaintiff:
LaVonne Rodgers and Wesley Rodgers
Defendant:
Doordash Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-521
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats and Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae:
United States Chamber of Commerce
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-522
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc., Postmates Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats
Defendant / Appellant:
Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae:
United States Chamber of Commerce
Lendenbaum v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lendenbaum
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Binbek v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03729
Plaintiff:
Asha Binbek
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
White v. Doordash, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02201
Plaintiff:
Paula White
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jeremy Lafitte v. Unknown
as 22-15015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY LAFITTE, In Rem: Secured Property rights and interest in all assets owned or possessed by DoorDash inc. and the proceeds of sale and transfer of all assets as surety for breach of obligations in the amount of $200,000.00
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN
Piero Bugoni v. Checkr, Inc., et al
as 21-16994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PIERO A. BUGONI
Defendant / Appellee:
CHECKR, INC., DOORDASH, INC., INSTACART, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
