Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Yamini v. Richards et al
as 3:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Dorian Yamini
Defendant:
B Richards, Robin Bortok, Dr. David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. The City of East St. Louis Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv03349
Plaintiff:
Dorian Hendricks
Defendant:
The City of East St. Louis Police Department, The City of East St. Louis, Jason Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murray v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv09581
Plaintiff:
Dorian Murray
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Slaughter v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Charles Slaughter
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walls v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05681
Plaintiff:
Dorian Walls
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Former Police Sgt. Ronald Watts, Officer Gerome Summers Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodliff v. Saul
as 3:2020cv50322
Plaintiff:
Dorian H. Woodliff
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cotledge v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv02629
Plaintiff:
Dorian Cotledge
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
