Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Dorsey v. Topeka, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02422
Plaintiff:
Brently Dorsey
Defendant:
Topeka, Kansas, City of and City of Topeka Fire Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown (ID 95054) v. Lundry et al
as 5:2019cv03152
Defendant:
Debra Lundry, Jennifer Clements, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
William E. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Promise Keepers, Inc., The et al
as 2:2019cv02091
Defendant:
The Promise Keepers 417 Inc., The Promise Keepers, Inc., Promise Keepers 417, Inc., The and others
Plaintiff:
Kendra Ross
Petitioner:
Ephraim Woods, Jr. and Irma Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorsey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 5:2017cv04009
Plaintiff:
Lateesha Dorsey
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy (ID 76894) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv03014
Plaintiff:
DeRon McCoy, Jr.
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Century Link, James Heimgartner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winfield Solutions, LLC v. Stapleton et al
as 2:2013cv02340
Plaintiff:
Winfield Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Roma Stapleton, Dorsey Stapleton, Shawn Stapleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Dorsey v. Richardson
as 5:2012cv03113
Petitioner:
Lemandreal Dorsey
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dorsey v. Richardson
as 5:2012cv03087
Petitioner:
Lemandreal Dorsey
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
