Cases 11 - 20 of 133
Michael Dotson v. Great Australian Wine Company, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03393
Plaintiff:
Michael Dotson
Defendant:
Great Australian Wine Company, Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Elliot Nazos et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv02214
Plaintiff:
Elliot Nazos, Christine Blight, Jack Perry and others
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Michael Dotson v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC
as 2:2022cv00923
Plaintiff:
Michael Dotson
Defendant:
Arizona Beverages USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Marcus Rowland v. Sergeant Andrade et al
as 5:2021cv01709
Plaintiff:
Marcus Rowland
Defendant:
Sergeant Andrade, Deputy Overton, Deputy Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raevin Dotson v. Smashbox Beauty Cosmetics, Inc.
as 2:2021cv04204
Defendant:
Smashbox Beauty Cosmetics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Raevin Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PC) Richardson v. Allison et al
as 1:2021cv00070
Plaintiff:
Asali M. Richardson
Defendant:
M. Pallares, Mitchell, Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv07932
Defendant:
McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Dotson v. Euro Pharma, Inc.
as 2:2020cv09651
Defendant:
Euro Pharma, Inc. and Euro Pharma, Inc. doing business as Terry Naturally
Plaintiff:
Michael Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sarah Som Dotson v. Juice Beauty, Inc.
as 2:2020cv09402
Defendant:
Juice Beauty, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sarah Som-Dotson
Susan Baker et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 2:2020cv04335
Plaintiff:
Leonard A. Semas, Jim Kless, Ed Quintal and others
Defendant:
Does 1-100, inclusive, DSM P GP LLC, Janet Chubb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
