Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Dean v. Gillespie
as 2:2011cv01226
Plaintiff:
Charles Dean
Defendant:
Doug Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapien v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2011cv01200
Defendant:
Jim Dixon, Captian Donahue, Doug Gillespie and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Sapien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Glover v. Doug Gillespie
as 11-16593
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAWN LYNN GLOVER
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUG GILLESPIE
Gibbs v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2011cv01061
Plaintiff:
Ernest Gibbs, Jr.
Defendant:
Doug Gillespie and John Pelletier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Allen v. Clark County Detention Center, et al
as 11-15580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD LEE ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, COUNTY OF CLARK, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, MCGROREY and others
Parker v. Nephcare Med. Group et al
as 2:2011cv00267
Defendant:
Agents of CCDC, Doug Gillespie, Dr. Kirkwood and others
Plaintiff:
Randahl M. Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brodzki v. Chief Weiss et al
as 9:2011cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brodzki
Defendant:
Chief Weiss, Jim Purdue and Doug Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Allen v. Clark County Detention Center, et al
as 11-15284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD LEE ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, COUNTY OF CLARK, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, MCGROREY and others
Glover et al v. Gillespie
as 2:2011cv00011
Respondent:
Doug Gillespie
Petitioner:
Shawn Lynn Glover
702) 382-5815 (fax:
Chief Deputy DA Steven S. Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
K. C. Keith Coulter v. Clark County Children Protecti, et al
as 10-17649
Plaintiff - Appellant:
K. C. KEITH COULTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK COUNTY CHILDREN PROTECTION SERVICES, LISA TEELE, AJAMARH MELSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
