Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
Foothills Correctional Institution, FNU Hudgins, FNU Motley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Reep et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Reep, Doug Newton, Foothills Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Anderson v. Goodsum
as 23-7096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GOODSUM, Individual and Official Capacity, PRICE, Individual and Official Capacity, DOUG NEWTON, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Anderson v. Goodsum et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Albert Marquavious Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Goodsum, FNU Price, Doug Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Dametri Dale
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Foothills Correctional Institution, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacques Floyd v. North Carolina Dept of Corr
as 11-6572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUES CRAIG FLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDY TEAGUE, Superintendent Marion Correctional Institution and DOUG NEWTON, Assistant Unit Manager of E-Unit at Marion Correctional Institution
Floyd v. Teague et al
as 1:2011cv00080
Defendant:
Randy Teague and Doug Newton
Plaintiff:
Jacques Craig Floyd
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Newton et al
as 1:2011cv00046
Plaintiff:
LaDarrion Turner
Defendant:
Doug Newton, Nurse FNU Medford, Doctor LNU and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
