Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Doughty v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05537
Plaintiff:
Teresa Doughty
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Musall et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03820
Plaintiff:
Sharon Diane Musall and George Doughty, III
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doughty v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv02693
Plaintiff:
Yvonne S. Doughty
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doughty v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04137
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Doughty
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doughty et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv33016
Plaintiff:
Glenna Mae Doughty and Richard Doughty
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doughty et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv19006
Plaintiff:
Patricia L. Doughty and Thomas E. Doughty
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doughty et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv00631
Plaintiff:
Connie Doughty and Walter Doughty
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2012md02326
Plaintiff:
Brenda Moyer (WVSD CA 2:11-0810) , Jason Moyer (WVSD CA 2:11-0810) , Nicole Preston (WVSD CA 2:12-0263) and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , C. R. Bard, Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murdock v. Higginbotham et al
as 2:2008cv01054
Plaintiff:
Daniel Murdock
Defendant:
Ryan Higginbotham, Mark Petty, Justin Doughty and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Myers v. Dickinson et al.
as 2:2008cv00323
Plaintiff:
Adam P. Myers
Defendant:
C. A. Dickinson, D. O. Nikocevic, N. A. Null and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
