Cases 1 - 10 of 135
(HC) Jackson v. Borla
as 1:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Douglas V Jackson
Respondent:
Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas Jackson v. Nathan Hoffman
as 23-2065
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
NATHAN HOFFMAN, Warden
Jackson v. Villasenor, et al.
as 23-3999
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS VARNELL JACKSON, III
Defendant / Appellee:
VILLASENOR, Correctional Officer and LUNA, Corrections Officer
JACKSON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, JOHNNY FRAMBO and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dixon et al
as 1:2023cv23616
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall Jackson
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon doing business as Secretary, Johmmy Frambo doing business as Chaplaincy Services Administrator for FDC and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Jackson v. David Pynnonen, et al
as 23-1735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DAVID PYNNONEN and PRISON GUARD CODY HAATAJA
Douglas Jackson v. Quentin Bolton, et al
as 23-1701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON, named as Douglas Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY WARDEN HOULT, individual and official capacity, LIBRARIAN BOMER, individual and official capacity, COUNSELOR KEVIN COLLISON, individual and official capacity and others
Jackson #748757 v. Bolton et al
as 2:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Douglas Cornell Jackson #748757
Defendant:
Quentin Bolton, Unknown Hoult, Unknown Bomer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Jackson v. David Pynnonen, et al
as 23-1437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DAVID PYNNONEN and PRISON GUARD CODY HAATAJA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
