Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Alexander et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Amy Alexander and Douglas Alexander
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Douglas Pineda Santos v. William Barr
as 20-73454
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS ALEXANDER PINEDA SANTOS
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Douglas Alexander v. Lake County Sheriff's Departme, et al
as 20-2737
Defendant / Appellee:
LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and TED UCHIEK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS ALEXANDER
John Alexander v. Bryan Stirling
as 20-6248
Defendant / Appellee:
THE SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KURT STEVENS, Agent Individial and Official Capacities, M. N. BARKER, Disciplinary Hearing Officer Individial and Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOUGLAS ALEXANDER
ALEXANDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv09436
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Lake County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2019cv04994
Plaintiff:
Douglas Alexander
Defendant:
Uchiek and Lake County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Shanes et al
as 1:2019cv03744
Defendant:
Daniel B. Shanes and John Murphy
Plaintiff:
Douglas Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas Amador-Gutierrez v. William Barr
as 19-71046
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS ALEXANDER AMADOR-GUTIERREZ, AKA Douglas Amador
Douglas Amador-Gutierrez v. William Barr
as 19-70977
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS ALEXANDER AMADOR-GUTIERREZ, AKA Douglas Amador
LMP YACHTS, LLC
as 1:2019cv21407
Plaintiff:
LMP YACHTS, LLC
Respondent:
Douglas Alexander
Claimant:
HMY Yacht Sales Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
