Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6574
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Lauter v. George Schaefer, III
as 21-2189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LAUTER
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE E. SCHAEFER, III, UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE and others
Willie Casper, III v. Dougles Robelen
as 20-7672
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS B. ROBELEN, Clerk of Court, JOHN DOE 2 and JOHN DOE 1
Defendant:
ALAN P. KRASNOFF, Clerk of Court
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE LEE CASPER, III
Casper III v. Krasnoff et al
as 1:2020cv00802
Defendant:
Douglas B. Robelen and Alan P. Krasnoff
Plaintiff:
Willie L Casper III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Newkirk v. Artisha Gregg
as 16-6623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTISHA GREGG, Hampton Commonwealth of Virginia, MR. HUFF, Chief Judge, MR. DECKER, Judge and others
Newkirk v. Gregg et al
as 3:2016cv00139
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Artisha Gregg, Huff, Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Sindram v. Douglas Robelen
as 11-2005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS B. ROBELEN, State Actor, GERALD BRUCE LEE, PHYLLIS T. WALTON and others
Defendant:
PATRICIA L. HARRINGTON
Michael Sindram v. Douglas Robelen
as 11-1093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS B. ROBELEN, State Actor, GERALD BRUCE LEE, PHYLLIS T. WALTON and others
Defendant:
PATRICIA L. HARRINGTON
Michael Sindram v. Patricia Harrington
as 10-2293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. HARRINGTON, DOUGLAS B. ROBELEN, State Actor, GERALD BRUCE LEE and others
Michael Sindram v. Patricia Harrington
as 10-2073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. HARRINGTON, DOUGLAS B. ROBELEN, State Actor, GERALD BRUCE LEE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
