Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
as 7:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
Plaintiff:
Douglas Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davy v. Davis
as 6:2019cv00250
Petitioner:
Lonnie Douglas Davy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2014cv01577
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Courvill et al
as 2:2012cv01023
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Douglas Davis
Defendant:
Courvill, Zack, Anthony Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. West et al
as 2:2012cv00906
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Douglas Davis
Defendant:
West, Tyler, Ceaser Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Courvill et al
as 4:2012cv01048
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Douglas Davis
Defendant:
Courvill, Zack, Anthony Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis vs. Harris County Jail Medical, et al
as 4:2012cv00967
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Douglas Davis
Defendant:
Harris County Jail Medical Administration, Harris County Jail Medical Nurses and Nurse Practioners and Harris County Jail Medical Doctors and Assist Doctors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. West et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT
as 4:2012cv00906
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Douglas Davis
Defendant:
West, Tyler, Ceaser Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swift Technical Services LLC v. Davis
as 2:2011cv03012
Plaintiff:
Swift Technical Services LLC
Defendant:
Douglas Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Simpson et al
as 1:2008cv00329
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Douglas Davis
Defendant:
Stephen B. Simpson, Angelle Webb, Patricia Bodin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
