Cases 1 - 9 of 9
William Dawson, Jr. v. Larry Cartledge
as 15-7420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS DAWSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE, in his individual capacity and ASSOCIATE WARDEN FLORENCE MAUNEY, in her individual capacity
William Dawson, Jr. v. Denis Bush
as 15-6325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS DAWSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ASS. WARDEN DENIS BUSH, Individually and in their official capacity, WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE, Individually and in their official capacity and ASS. WARDEN FLORENCE MAUNEY, Individually and in their official capacity
Dawson v. Loving
as 4:2014cv03428
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Dawson, Jr
Defendant:
Timothy Loving
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Cartledge et al
as 4:2014cv03259
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Dawson, Jr
Defendant:
Larry Cartledge and Florence Mauney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Dawson, Jr. v. Rhonda Abston
as 14-6881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS DAWSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN RHONDA ABSTON, WARDEN MICHAEL MCCALL, ASSISTANT WARDEN FLORENCE MAUNEY and others
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
William Dawson, Jr. v. Captain Rhonda Abston
as 13-8059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS DAWSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN RHONDA ABSTON, WARDEN MICHAEL MCCALL, ASSISTANT WARDEN FLORENCE MAUNEY and others
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Dawson v. Bush et al
as 4:2013cv02236
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Dawson, Jr
Defendant:
Denis Bush, Larry Cartledge and Florence Mauney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Abston et al
as 4:2013cv01366
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Dawson, Jr
Defendant:
Rhonda Abston, Michael McCall, Florence Mauney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
William Dawson v. Stan Burtt
as 08-7842
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS DAWSON
Respondent - Appellee:
STAN BURTT, Warden
Respondent - None:
HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General for South Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
