Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HUMPHREY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS E. HUMPHREY
Defendant:
PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, UNIT MANAGER WITT and RNS CREVLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Humphrey, Sr.In re: Douglas Humphrey, Sr.
as 19-2422
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRADFORD COUNTY
Petitioner:
In re: DOUGLAS E. HUMPHREY, SR.
Douglas Humphrey, Sr. v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 15-3250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS E. HUMPHREY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRIAN COLEMAN, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY SUED IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, VINCENT R. MAZESKI, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY SUED IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES and others
HUMPHREY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv01349
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS E. HUMPHREY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN COLEMAN, VINCENT MAZESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humphrey v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2014cv01683
Plaintiff:
Douglas E Humphrey
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Brian Coleman, Vincent Mazeski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas Humphrey, Sr. v. Basil Merenda, et al
as 12-3079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS E. HUMPHREY, SR.
Defendant:
BASIL L. MERENDA and MARTHA H. BROWN
Humphrey v. Merenda et al
as 3:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Douglas E Humphrey
Defendant:
Basil L. Merenda and Martha H. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humphrey v. Merenda et al
as 3:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Humphrey
Defendant:
Basil L Merenda and Pennsylvania Department of State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Humphrey v. Pennsylvania Department of State
as 3:2011cv02328
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Humphrey
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas Humphrey, Sr. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 10-3275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS E. HUMPHREY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
