Cases 1 - 10 of 18
(PC) Taylor v. Barth et al
as 2:2023cv01736
Plaintiff:
Michael Douglas Taylor
Defendant:
Shawn Barth and Ramona Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Taylor v. Phoenix House California et al
as 3:2023cv01135
Plaintiff:
Michael Douglas Taylor
Defendant:
Phoenix House California, Frank Sharpe and Does1-through-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Toole, et al v. Avalon Care Center VA Hilo, L.L.C., et al
as 1:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Diane Zerfuss OToole, Gary A. Powell, Ricki Lynn Hong and others
Defendant:
Avalon Care Center - VA Hilo, L.L.C. a foreign limited liability company doing business as Yukio Okutsu State Veterans Home, Avalon of Hawaii, L.L.C. a foreign limited liability company doing business as Avalon Care of Hawaii, Avalon Care, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Michael Taylor v. Daniel Paramo
as 18-55427
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL DOUGLAS TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Michael Taylor v. Daniel Paramo
as 17-72090
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DOUGLAS TAYLOR
Respondent:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Michael Douglas Taylor v. Daniel Paramo, Warden
as 2:2017cv04211
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo, Warden
Petitioner:
Michael Douglas Taylor
Michael Taylor v. Daniel Paramo
as 16-72777
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DOUGLAS TAYLOR
Respondent:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Taylor v. Din et al
as 3:2016cv00499
Plaintiff:
Michael Douglas Taylor
Defendant:
Raymond A. Din, AW, Donna S. Brubaker, SSA, R. Gysler, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
