Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Tedtaotao v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00016
Plaintiff:
Joshua John Tedtaotao and Joshua John Pangelinan
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Dr. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Esperon v. Carbullido
as 1:2020cv00027
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph Carbullido
Plaintiff:
James J. Esperon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marks v. Hellmont et al
as 1:2019cv00142
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Marks
Defendant:
Dr Deider Neuper, Lars Filip Hellmont and Dr. Deider Neuper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00046
Defendant:
Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc., David Creech, Paul Bolin and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Sherif A. Philips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivadeneira V. Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.), et al.
as 1:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Dr. Felix Guzman Rivadeneira
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.), Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (I.C.E.), United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny
as 1:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cruz v. Director of the Department of Revenue and Taxation
as 1:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
Dr. Olivia T. Cruz
Defendant:
Director of the Department of Revenue and Taxation
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1424
Castro v. Palacios et al
as 1:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Castro, Jr.
Defendant:
Jose B. Palacios and Dr. Young Chang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weatherby v. Palacios et al
as 1:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
Charles Weatherby
Defendant:
Jose B. Palacios, Joseph Afaisen, Linda Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jessy v. Palacios et al
as 1:2010cv00020
Plaintiff:
Taisen Jessy
Defendant:
Jose B. Palacios and Dr. Young Chang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
