Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Paul Quinn et al v. Dermatech Research, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07339
Plaintiff:
Paul Quinn and PDQ Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Dr. David Young, Scott Davis, Lori Jacobus and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Celgene Corporation v. Hetero Labs Limited et al
as 3:2019cv01589
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., Apotex Corp. and others
Petitioner:
Anthony Insogna and Dr. David A. Gay
Plaintiff:
Celgene Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lua v. Clayton
as 3:2019cv01169
Defendant:
Medical Dr. David Clayton
Plaintiff:
Hugo Lua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jared J. Marks v. Randolf Wilson et al
as 2:2019cv05238
Plaintiff:
Jared J. Marks
Defendant:
Randolf Wilson, Dr. Aye, Dr. David Loya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. Mellanox Technologies Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv02406
Plaintiff:
David Thornton
Defendant:
Jack R. Lazar, Eyal Waldman, Mellanox Technologies Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Reply SpA v. Sensoria Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00450
Defendant:
Sensoria Holdings Ltd., Maurizio Macagno, Sensoria Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Reply S.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eshalom v. Hendricks et al
as 6:2019cv00159
Defendant:
Ms. Shanon P., Dr. David Pressman, Dr. Elliot and others
Plaintiff:
Linzin R. Eshalom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dr. David Harris, III v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
as 8:2018cv00876
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dr. David Harris, III
Luurs v. Sanders et al
as 6:2018cv00435
Defendant:
Dennis Buckmaster, Marie Gainer, Curtis Landers and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Schwarm Luurs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tybie P. O Bard-Honorato v. David J. Shulkin
as 2:2017cv09179
Plaintiff:
Tybie P. O Bard-Honorato
Defendant:
Dr. David J. Shulkin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
