Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Redden v. Mnuchin et al
as 5:2021cv00063
Defendant:
Charles Rettig, Dr. David Proctor, Kimberly Paton and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. Redden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00720
Defendant:
I-X C.O. John/Jane Does, Kim Paton, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanham v. Sandy et al
as 3:2019cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Lanham
Defendant:
Michael Martin, Jeff S. Sandy, Sherry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryner v. Dr. David S. Schwartz, Inc., Pension Plan & Trust
as 3:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
Sean Levan Bryner
Defendant:
Dr. David S. Schwartz, Inc., Pension Plan & Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Rogers v. Proctor et al
as 2:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Rogers
Defendant:
Dr. David Proctor, Mark Baker, Tristan Tenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Proctor et al
as 2:2012cv00032
Plaintiff:
Mark Riley
Defendant:
Dr. David Proctor and Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pannell v. Proctor et al
as 2:2011cv00062
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Pannell
Defendant:
Dr. David Proctor, Tristen Tenny and Wexford Medical Sources Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winning v. H.C.C. Medical Unit Staff et al
as 2:2011cv00060
Plaintiff:
Richard Winning
Defendant:
H.C.C. Medical Unit Staff, Tristin Tenny and Dr. David Proctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ault v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
Stoney William Ault
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., James C. Boddey, Henry Presser, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Proctor et al
as 5:2008cv00167
Plaintiff:
Leslie M. Lewis
Defendant:
Dr. David Proctor, Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and Wexford Health Sources
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
