Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Poledore v. Doe et al
as 4:2022cv01863
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Poledore
Defendant:
Dr. John Doe, Supervisor John Doe and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Reeves et al
as 3:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Terry Curtis
Defendant:
Govornor Tate Reeves, Commisioner Burl Cain, Dr John Doe Brazier and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Arnold et al
as 3:2019cv00813
Defendant:
Dr. Jane Doe, Pelicia Hall, Commissioner, Gov. Phil Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
John Ashley Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. University Mississippi Medical Center et al
as 3:2018cv00698
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Dr. John Doe, State of Mississippi, Nurse Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Monice Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Centurion Heathcare Services et al
as 3:2018cv00699
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Centurion Heathcare Services, Dr. John Doe-Frazier and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Monice Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Hale v. Roland Abangan, et al
as 18-60183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ASHLEY HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. ROLAND ABANGAN, Official and Individual Capacity, DR. JOHN DOE, Official and Individual Capacity, JOHN AND JANE DOES and others
Warren v. Dr. John Doe et al
as 4:2016cv03631
Plaintiff:
James Wendell Warren
Defendant:
Dr. John Doe and Dr. Earnestine Julye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Arcade Comeaux, Jr. v. Darrell Sutton, et al
as 13-20566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCADE JOSEPH COMEAUX, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRELL SUTTON, MARK BISCAMP, ROBERT JENKINS, JR. and others
Colgrove v. University Of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 4:2011cv02046
Plaintiff:
Ray Colgrove
Defendant:
University Of Texas Medical Branch, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Jaime Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
