Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Michael Connolly v. Jose OQuendo, et al
as 13-3763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOSEPH CONNOLLY
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O JOSE OQUENDO, C/O DRAINS, C/O LINDSEY, 7-3 Shift and others
DRAIN v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2013cv02359
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER DRAIN
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07807
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 (c)(1) Findings, Concl. & Proposed Judgment
DRAIN et al v. ZIMMER, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05728
Plaintiff:
IVRY R. DRAIN and JEFFREY DRAIN
Defendant:
ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and ZIMMER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUPERMEDIA LLC v. RAPID ROOTER PLUMBING & DRAIN CLEANING SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00891
Plaintiff:
SUPERMEDIA LLC
Defendant:
RAPID ROOTER PLUMBING & DRAIN CLEANING SERVICES, INC., EXTREME BUILDING SERVICES LLC and DAVID NIEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONNOLLY v. OQUENDO et al
as 2:2012cv00315
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH CONNOLLY
Defendant:
JOSE OQUENDO, DRAINS, LINDSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRAIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51978
Plaintiff:
DANIEL E. DRAIN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DRAIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53378
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. DRAIN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ADAMS v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80030
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. DRAIN
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION, THE FLINTKOTE COMPANY, ROCKWOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DRAIN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70281
Plaintiff:
DANIEL E. DRAIN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
