Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Williams v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2024cv10080
Plaintiff:
Sabrina M Williams and Pro se litigant Sabrina M Williams
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Judge Theresa Bisenius, Judge Jennifer Ulwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Galarza v. Pimentel et al
as 1:2023cv12881
Plaintiff:
Christina M Galarza
Defendant:
Katrina Pimentel, Kreg Espinola, Joseph L Michaud and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Driscoll II v. Leaf
as 1:2023cv12835
Plaintiff:
James M. Driscoll II
Defendant:
Robert Leaf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Donovan et al v. Driscoll et al
as 1:2022cv11462
Plaintiff:
Shawn Donovan and Claire Donovan
Defendant:
Kimberly Driscoll and Others Known and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leaf v. Driscoll II et al
as 1:2022cv10482
Plaintiff:
Robert Leaf
Defendant:
James M. Driscoll II and Michael Driscoll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
James Aftosmes et al v. Town of Hingham
as 1:2022cv10314
Plaintiff:
James Aftosmes, Cameron Allegra, James Arena and others
Defendant:
Town of Hingham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Meisenheimer v. Driscoll et al
as 4:2021cv10569
Defendant:
Derek J. Driscoll and Calyx, LLC
Plaintiff:
Terri Meisenheimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meisenheimer v. Driscoll et al
as 1:2021cv10569
Defendant:
Derek J. Driscoll and Calyx, LLC
Plaintiff:
Terri Meisenheimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meisenheimer v. Calyx, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv10571
Defendant:
Calyx, LLC and Derek J. Driscoll
Plaintiff:
Terri Meisenheimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
