Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Capen, et al v. Campbell
as 24-1061
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R. CAPEN and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS
Defendant:
ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Interested Party:
BRADY, MARCH FOR OUR LIVES, GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and others
Cotto, et al v. Campbell, et al
as 23-2069
Plaintiff:
STACY FOSTER, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JAMIE KIMBALL, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JONATHAN RILEY, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, Attorney General, TIMOTHY SHUGRUE, Berkshire County District Attorney and others
Beaudoin v. Baker, et al
as 23-1989
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN PAUL BEAUDOIN, JR. and JOHN PAUL BEAUDOIN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., MAURA TRACY HEALEY, in her official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, MARGARET R. COOKE, individually and in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Public Health of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Linardon v. Boston Housing Authority, et al
as 23-1185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELECHI LINARDON
Defendant / Appellee:
BOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, MICHELLE WU, Mayor of Boston, in her official capacity, CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., Governor of Massachusetts and others
Hajri v. Walsh, former Mayor of the City of Boston, et al
as 22-1825
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDELKRIM HAJRI
Defendant / Appellee:
RACHAEL SPLAINE ROLLINS, former Suffolk District Attorney, CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., Massachusetts Commonwealth Governor, MARTIN J. WALSH, former Mayor of the City of Boston and others
Defendant:
CHIEF OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, SUFFOLK COUNTY, Boston District and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union, et al v. Mici, et al
as 22-1747
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MA CORRECTION OFFICERS FEDERATED UNION, (MCOFU) and MICHAEL MOSHER
Plaintiff:
ZAC GUSTAFSON, DENINA DUNN and ANGELA PUCCI
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROL A. MICI, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Correction and CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Interested Party:
PRISONERS' LEGAL SERVICES, DR. YONATHAN GRAD, DR. MONIK C. JIMENEZ and others
Clapp v. Tobin, et al
as 22-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN S. CLAPP
Defendant:
CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., Governor of Massachusetts, MICHAEL W. MORRISSEY, Norfolk County District Attorney, RICHARD D. MCKEON, Massachusetts State Police (Retired) and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TROOPER BRUCE TOBIN, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office, TROOPER SCOTT KEARNS, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office, SGT. BRIAN BROOKS, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office and others
Darby, et al v. US, et al
as 22-1197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DARBY, SHEILA DARBY, DARRELL DARBY and others
Defendant:
US BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, UNKNOWN ATF POLICE OFFICERS, MAURA TRACY HEALEY, State Attorney General and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Chan v. Baker, Jr., et al
as 22-1093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIMON CHAN, Former Employee of Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority and SIMON WAI CHAN, Former Employee of Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, JAMEY TESLER, Secretary & CEO of Massachusetts Department of Transportation, STEVE POFTAK, General Manager of Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, MBTA and Vice-chair of the Fiscal Management & Control Board, FMCB and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
