Cases 1 - 10 of 1,199
Smith v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
as 24-1049
Plaintiff:
DUANE SMITH, as Administrator of the Estate of Barbara Shelton, deceased
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT
Not Yet Classified:
ROOF DIAGNOSTICS SOLAR & ELECTRIC LLC and NRG ENERGY, INC.
Jackson v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1771
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, in relation to The Nevada Department of Corrections, E K MCDANIEL, DWIGHT WALTER NEVEN and others
Nastasi & Associates, Inc. v. Bloomberg, L.P.
as 24-545
Plaintiff:
NASTASI & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
BLOOMBERG, L.P., TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, EUROTECH CONSTRUCTION CORP. and others
Bai et al v. CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP et al
as 2:2024at00303
Plaintiff:
Shi Bai, Jing Cai, Yikun Cai and others
Defendant:
CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP, CMB Export LLC, NK Immigration Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bai et al v. CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP et al
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Shi Bai, Jing Cai, Yikun Cai and others
Defendant:
CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP, CMB Export LLC, NK Immigration Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Peterson
as 2:2024mc50234
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Duane Peterson
Interested Party:
Denise Terry
Hoipkemier et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Adam Hoipkemier and Kevin Epps
Defendant:
Duane V. Miller, Eric Macleod, Oak Ridge Project Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Mark Curtis, Jr.
as 24-1095
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK DUANE CURTIS, JR.
Grapperhaus v. OPM
as 24-1415
Petitioner:
DUANE J. GRAPPERHAUS
Respondent:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
