Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Martin v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv00477
Plaintiff:
Roger Duane Martin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sheffield v. USA
as 4:2013cv00034
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Duane Sheffield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wynn v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2013cv00107
Plaintiff:
Tommy E. Wynn, Jr.
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Duane Calloway and Trish Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. Mitchael et al
as 2:2012cv03075
Plaintiff:
Duane LeRoy Fox
Defendant:
Mitchael, Nite, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Nashville Limo Bus, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv01268
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ray Massey
Defendant:
Nashville Limo Bus, LLC and Tracy Duane McMurtry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Diehl et al v. Rarity Bay Community Association Inc. et al (TV1)
as 3:2012cv00499
Receiver:
Sterling P Owen, IV
Plaintiff:
Bruce Diehl and Julianne M. Diehl
Defendant:
Rarity Bay Community Association Inc. , James Glasgow , Carolyn B Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Headden et al v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2012cv00269
Plaintiff:
James Phillip Headden , Doug Stone , Robert Evans and others
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga , Ron Littlefield , Chattanooga Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Paulk et al v. Sevier County, Tennessee et al (TV2)
as 3:2012cv00089
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Paulk , Duane Foster and Daphne Foster
Defendant:
Sevier County, Tennessee, Sevier County Commission, Ronald L Seals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
