Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Sanders v. Ray et al
as 4:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Michael Donald Lee Sanders
Defendant:
Darrin Ray and Duckworth & Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Duckworth
as 22-20039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
Tony Duckworth, also known as Anthony and Darin Ray
Peters v. Duckworth et al
as 4:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Michael G Peters, Dalton G Peters and D.G.P.
Defendant:
Tony Duckworth and Darin Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John McPartlin v. Rhonda Hunter, et al
as 18-10324
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN MCPARTLIN
Defendant - Appellant:
RHONDA HUNTER, DR. JOSEPH CAPPS, DR. AZUCENA DUCKWORTH, In their individual capacities and others
Mark Christensen v. Eddy Mejia, et al
as 17-11015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANDREW CHRISTENSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
EDDY MEJIA, Warden, LANE JAFFE, Former Health Services Administrator, RHONDA HUNTER, Health Service Administrator and others
Peters v. Duckworth
as 4:2015cv03024
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant:
Tony Duckworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPartlin v. Hunter et al
as 3:2015cv03042
Plaintiff:
John McPartlin
Defendant:
Rhonda Hunter, Joseph Capps and Azucena Duckworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv00696
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Jackson
Defendant:
United States of America, Rodney Chandler, Charles E Samuels, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stephen Haynes v. USA, et al
as 15-10381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN D. HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MAUREEN CRUZ, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Seagoville, BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE, Assistant Warden and others
Munoz v. Hunter et al
as 3:2015cv00980
Plaintiff:
Feliciano Munoz
Defendant:
NFN Hunter, NFN Jeffe, NFN Duckworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
