Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt v. Compton Cowboys, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02642
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant:
Compton Cowboys, Inc., Israel Houghton, Jekalyn Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clarke v. Romney et al
as 1:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Mitt Romney, Tammy Baldwin, John Barrasso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips et al v. Duckworth et al
as 2:2020cv02345
Defendant:
Administrative Office of the Courts, Robin Sweet, Stephen Grierson and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Shahroki and T. Matthew Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carefoot et al v. County of Kern et al
as 1:2017cv00456
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Carefoot and J.H.
Defendant:
County of Kern, Kim Duckworth, Annie Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carefoot et al v. County of Kern et al
as 1:2017at00270
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Carefoot and J.H., a Minor
Defendant:
County of Kern, Kim Duckworth, Annie Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Duckworth v. Pierce County, et al
as 16-35843
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN CURTIS DUCKWORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
PIERCE COUNTY and ROBERT CARPENTER, Pierce County Sheriff's Deputy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015at00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6
Duckworth v. Pierce County et al
as 2:2014cv01359
Plaintiff:
Steven Curtis Duckworth
Defendant:
Pierce County , Pierce County Sheriff's Department and Robert Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duckworth v. Pierce County, et al
as 2:2014cv01361
Plaintiff:
Steven Curtis Duckworth
Defendant:
Pierce County , Pierce County Sheriff's Department and Robert Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
