Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Gaither v. Epps, et al.
as 1:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Russell Gaither
Defendant:
Brian K. Epps and Dudley H. Bowen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Graham et al
as 8:2014cv01854
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
James E. Graham, HuLane E. George, Joy D. Honeycut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Murphy, III et al
as 1:2014cv00012
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
Stephen J. Murphy, III, Carol Cohron, James E. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Henderson v. James Graham, et al
as 13-10641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. GRAHAM, Magistrate Judge, LISA GODBEY WOOD, District Judge, DUDLEY H. BOWEN, JR., District Judge and others
Robert Watkins v. Dudley Bowen, Jr.
as 12-15492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DUDLEY H. BOWEN, JR.
Henderson v. Graham, et al
as 3:2012cv00085
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
James E. Graham, Lisa Godbey Wood, W. Leon Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Bowen
as 1:2012cv02108
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Watkins
Defendant:
Dudley H. Bowen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Barfield et al
as 3:2012cv00029
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
W. Leon Barfield and Dudley H. Bowen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Jeburk v. Dudley Bowen, Jr., et al
as 10-15945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER L. JEBURK
Defendant - Appellee:
DUDLEY H. BOWEN, JR., Individually and as the Senior District Judge of the USDC for the Southern District of Georgia, RICHARD H. GOOLSBY, Individually and as Asst. US Atty for USDC SDGA, JACK E. BOONE, JR., (Deceased) Counsel for Pla and others
Jeburk v. Bowen et al
as 1:2010cv00073
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Jeburk
Defendant:
Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., Richard H. Goolsby, Jack E. Boone, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
