Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Guzman v. Robertson et al
as 3:2020cv02340
Defendant:
Jim Robertson, Ralph Diaz, Governor Gavin Newsom and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Guzman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neill v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv01669
Petitioner:
Neal O'Neill
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, California Medical Facility, Duel Vocational Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez v. Deuel Vocational Institution
as 2:2013cv02080
Plaintiff:
Steven Hernandez
Defendant:
Duel Vocational Institution Medical Personnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Deuel Vocational Institution
as 3:2013cv03915
Plaintiff:
Steven Hernandez
Defendant:
Duel Vocational Institution Medical Personnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters v. Duel Vocational Institution et al
as 2:2013cv01740
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lane Waters
Defendant:
Duel Vocational Institution and M. Silmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. California Depart. of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2012cv00345
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Webb
Defendant:
California Depart. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Michael Kim and Duel Vocational Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battiste v. Duel Vocation Institute
as 2:2010cv02035
Plaintiff:
Edward Antonio Battiste
Defendant:
Duel Vocation Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley v. Duel Vocational Institution Medical Facility
as 2:2009cv03353
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stanley
Defendant:
Duel Vocational Institution Medical Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battiste v. Duel Vocational Institution
as 2:2009cv02782
Plaintiff:
Edward Antonio Battiste
Defendant:
Duel Vocational Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. Duel Vocational Institution
as 2:2009cv01597
Plaintiff:
William Norton
Defendant:
Duel Vocational Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.