Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Duffy v. Warden
as 6:2022cv05857
Plaintiff:
Kenny Duffy and Kenny Joseph Duffy
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duffy v. Underwriters at Lloyds London
as 6:2022cv03323
Plaintiff:
Esther Duffy
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyds London
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rochon v. Lambert et al
as 6:2021cv04088
Plaintiff:
Jason Blaine Rochon
Defendant:
James Lambert, Andrew Ahrens, John Storment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Guillory Jr v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Co et al
as 3:2018cv01634
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Adam Reed, Gulf Relay, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Duffy Guillory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Protective Insurance Co et al
as 2:2017cv00969
Plaintiff:
Mary M Brown
Defendant:
Protective Insurance Co , Tri-Star Freight System Inc and Rodderick James Duffie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duffy v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2015cv00249
Plaintiff:
Jane Duffy
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duffy et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 6:2014cv01050
Plaintiff:
Daniel Duffy, Jr and Tonya Duffy
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and Pharmacia & Upjohn Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
