Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Morinville v. Upstate Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Carlos Morinville
Defendant:
Upstate Correctional Facility, T. Dukes, B. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Martquice T. Dukes
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Duke Jimenez
Defendant:
United States of America and Aaron J. Mango
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todie v. NYS DOCCs Parole Div. QNS Ballroop et al
as 1:2022cv07960
Plaintiff:
Eugene A. Todie
Defendant:
NYS DOCCs Parole Div. QNS Ballroop, Ballroops Assistant Diaz, Supervisor Gonzazes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Sullivan
as 22-3064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allen Rogers Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan, Commissioner of Mental Health, Daniell Dill, Acting Executive Director for Deborah McCulloch, Executive Director Central New York Psychiatric Center, Mr. Jamie Temple, Chief for Security, CNYPC and others
Scott v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Allen Rogers Scott
Defendant:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan, Daniell Dill, Mr. Jamie Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv04178
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #1 through #14, The City of New York, Bronx County and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. ICE
as 1:2019cv03201
Respondent:
ICE
Petitioner:
Michael Duke Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07195
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 b
Reeves v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv07194
Plaintiff:
Michael Duke Reeves
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
