Cases 1 - 10 of 192
Duke #060858 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2024cv08012
Petitioner:
Brent Fitzgerald Duke
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duke #060858 v. Thornell
as 3:2023cv08616
Petitioner:
Brent Fitzgerald Duke
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Office of the Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alba Anette Dukes v. Warden
as 5:2023cv01789
Petitioner:
Alba Anette Dukes
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Younger v. FCI Forrest City Medium et al
as 4:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Christopher Younger
Defendant:
FCI Forrest City Medium, Unknown Meadows, Unknown Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lafonzo Turner v. Duke et al
as 2:2023cv03204
Plaintiff:
Lafonzo R. Turner
Defendant:
Duke, Doe 1 and Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duke #060858 v. Shinn et al
as 3:2023cv08028
Petitioner:
Brent Fitzgerald Duke
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Dukes v. Soto et al
as 1:2021cv01570
Plaintiff:
Darnell Maurice Dukes
Defendant:
Tammy Soto and John Pearce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Anthony Duke, Sr. v. J. Walker et al
as 5:2021cv00796
Defendant:
J. Walker, Bethany Oh, T. Alatorre and others
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Duke, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Colston v. Vorkulin et al
as 1:2021cv00474
Plaintiff:
Koran Malcom Colston
Defendant:
Thibodeaux, Bryan Holmes, J. Cantu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Colston v. Vorkulin et al
as 2:2021cv00542
Plaintiff:
Koran Malcom Colston
Defendant:
Thibodeaux, Bryan Holmes, J. Cantu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
