Cases 31 - 40 of 102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
PICC PROPERTY AND CASUALTY, et al. v. RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC. et al.
as 1:2017cv04631
Defendant:
DUKE REALTY, HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY, ISS FACILITY SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PICC PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00189
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 FMLA: Enforcement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
PATEL v. SESSIONS, et al
as 2:2017cv00420
Respondent:
CLAY COUNTY SHERIFF, ELAINE C. DUKE, RACHEL MONTGOMERY and others
Petitioner:
ALKABEN PATEL
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. HUNT
as 1:2017cv02608
Defendant:
JAMES HUNT
Plaintiff:
RANDOLL DUKE JOHNSON, JR
Miscellaneou:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
