Cases 1 - 10 of 865
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Dunham v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
Eddie Dunham
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Integra Affordable Management LLC v. Dunham
as 1:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Integra Affordable Management LLC
Defendant:
Kenneth Dunham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Dunham v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mak v. Dunham et al
as 5:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Paul T Mak
Defendant:
Theodore R Dunham and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Berry v. Shaverlier et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
LaMarcus Valentino Berry
Defendant:
Unknown Shaverlier, Unknown Dunham, Bradley Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Peeples, et al v. Rachael Campbell, et al
as 24-1342
Plaintiff:
James Peeples and Tasiah Lee
Defendant:
Rachael Campbell, David McCormick, Judge, James Dunham and others
Dunham v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aruanno v. Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Authority et al
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Thomas Aruanno
Defendant:
Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Authority, Travis Hill, Mark Dunham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reeves v. Dunham et al
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Douglass Scott Reeves
Defendant:
James Dunham, Does Donna, Nurse Aid; David, Nurse; Pope County Detention Center and Michael Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
