Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Dunham v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
Eddie Dunham
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
James Peeples, et al v. Rachael Campbell, et al
as 24-1342
Plaintiff:
James Peeples and Tasiah Lee
Defendant:
Rachael Campbell, David McCormick, Judge, James Dunham and others
Reeves v. Dunham et al
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Douglass Scott Reeves
Defendant:
James Dunham, Does Donna, Nurse Aid; David, Nurse; Pope County Detention Center and Michael Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peeples et al v. Campbell et al
as 4:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
James Peeples and Tasiah Lee
Defendant:
Rachel Campbell, David McCormick, James Dunham and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
McCurley v. Dunham
as 4:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
Jesse L McCurley
Defendant:
James Dunham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden v. Reynolds et al
as 3:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Carson DeWayne Bolden, Jr
Defendant:
Phil Reynolds, Jim Dunham, Felicity Beal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holt v. Dunham et al
as 4:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Holt
Defendant:
Kenny Dunham, Nancy Lawrance and Crystal Stripland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dunham et al
as 4:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
Kenny Dunham, Nancy Lawrance and Crystal Stripland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurber v. Van Buren County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
Norman Thurber
Defendant:
Van Buren County, Arkansas, Lucas Emberton, Crystal Stripling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Van Buren County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Shawn Daniels
Defendant:
Van Buren County, Arkansas, Lucas Emberton, Crystal Stripling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
