Cases 1 - 10 of 355
DUNNE v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2023cv04938
Plaintiff:
SEAN DUNNE
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CRAIG v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv03608
Plaintiff:
RUBEN R. CRAIG, III
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, JOHN TERRA, DEPUTY WYNDHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNN et al v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv03491
Plaintiff:
RYAN DUNN and JOSIANE DUNN
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC-DUNNS & BROADSTREET #939795238 v. SMITH
as 2:2023cv03376
Plaintiff:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC-DUNNS & BROADSTREET #939795238
Defendant:
DENIVA SMITH and DENIYA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cummings v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
William Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas McGinley, Christopher Symons, C.O. Luke Erdman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Shears v. Dunn
as 1:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Daaron Shears
Defendant:
P. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. DOE et al
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAVIS
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE 1-9, LINDA ROSENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. DUNN et al
as 2:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
John K.A. Doe
Defendant:
Daniel Dunn, THE UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS, KATHRYN DONOVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
