Cases 1 - 10 of 187
IN RE: KEVIN DWIGHT
as 2:2024cv02513
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DWIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WEAVER
as 3:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DWIGHT J. WEAVER agent of d/b/a D.W. Hardwoods Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Black et al v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Daniel Black, Sally Gadd, Barry Godofsky and others
Defendant:
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC. and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Williams v. Sage
as 3:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Dwight Williams
Respondent:
Jessica Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BOWEN v. ZAKEN
as 2:2023cv02253
Petitioner:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horst v. Litz et al
as 1:2023cv00917
Plaintiff:
Dwight William Horst
Defendant:
Tina Litz, Michael Ott, Rebecca Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRAPER v. NEWMAN et al
as 2:2023cv01517
Petitioner:
PIERRE LEMONE DRAPER
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. NEWMAN and DWIGHT KELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
