Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Anderson v. McMillian et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU McMillian, Eric Dye, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Chambers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Larry Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Dawn Dye
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DYE-SHARPE v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2023cv00597
Plaintiff:
CORNELIA DYE-SHARPE
Defendant:
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, C.R. BARD, INC., BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
P1 Group, Inc. v. RipKurrent, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
P1 Group, Inc.
Defendant:
RipKurrent, LLC, Dye Capital & Company, LLC and Justin C. Dye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Chambers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Chambers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, FNU Dye, Richard Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kitchen v. Ishee et al
as 5:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
James Kitchen
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Larry Williamson, Lane Honeycutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stout v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Tommy Stout
Defendant:
FNU Honeycutt, FNU Dye, FNU Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lentz v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Shelby Reid Lentz
Defendant:
FNU Honeycutt, FNU Dye and Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Ishee et al
as 5:2022ct03218
Plaintiff:
Travis L. Cole
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Secretary Eddie M. Buffaloe, Jr., Kenneth Lassiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
