Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Dyer v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv04671
Petitioner:
Jonathan Dyer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dyer v. Elvis' Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv01383
Plaintiff:
Teleichia Dyer
Defendant:
Elvis' Services, Inc. and Mirnes Hrustic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Dyer v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv01128
Plaintiff:
Charles Mark Dyer
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barron et al v. Cuellar et al
as 5:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Angelic Barron, Rose Sanchez and Destiny Sanchez
Defendant:
Officer Richard Cuellar, Officer D Munoz, Officer R Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kruz v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Mr. Charles Edward Kruz and Charles Kruz
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and David S. Dyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oakley v. Dyer et al
as 2:2021cv00169
Plaintiff:
Randall Wayne Oakley
Defendant:
Amanda Dyer, Cassie Coppock, Tobie Bias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Caudillo et al
as 5:2021cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jacob James Kelly
Defendant:
Olivia Caudillo, David Dyer, Cody Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirby v. Rojas et al
as 5:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Castorian Kirby
Defendant:
Jennifer Rojas, Christian Ibarra, Christopher Zeleznikar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Caudillo et al
as 5:2021cv00106
Defendant:
Charles B Miller, Richard Aynes, Olivia Caudillo and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
