Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jones v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2022cv00164
Defendant:
Charles E Jones, Jr, Department of Homeland Security and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Charles E Jones
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braun v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00485
Defendant:
Southern Marinas, LLC, Mitchell E Jones, Southern Marinas Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Scot Braun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann PC et al
as 2:2019cv02480
Plaintiff:
Cheryl E. Jones
Not Yet Classified:
Donna Russell
Defendant:
Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann PC and PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hamby v. Parker et al
as 3:2019cv00233
Defendant:
Ken Hutchinson, Michael Parris, Tony Parker and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Hamby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rodger D. Wilson Facility Medical Department et al
as 2:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
Adrian E Jones
Defendant:
Rodger D. Wilson Facility Medical Department, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex - Medical Department, Rodger D. Wilson Facility Correction Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2014cv02295
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Jones, III
Defendant:
City of Memphis, State of TN, Shelby County D.A. Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seiber v. Ameridose, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00706
Plaintiff:
Tessa A Seiber
Defendant:
Ameridose, LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc., Medical Sales Management SW, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Jones v. George et al
as 1:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Jones
Defendant:
Enoch George and Debra Wagonshultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
