Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jones et al v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 2:2021cv00645
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jones and Michael E. Jones, II
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. American Red Cross Mid Atlantic Region et al
as 2:2020cv00004
Defendant:
John Does, Ryan Edsall and American Red Cross Mid Atlantic Region
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Jones and Melody Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones et al v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 3:2018cv01027
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Jones, Jr. and Shirley A. Jones
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Mediator:
James D. Lamp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04524
Plaintiff:
Donna E. Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv05241
Plaintiff:
Joyce E. Jones
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv30437
Plaintiff:
Joyce E. Jones and Larry D. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29835
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline E. Jones and Robert R. Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv28701
Plaintiff:
Ella E. Jones
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv23747
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16603
Plaintiff:
Kim E. Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
