Cases 11 - 20 of 32
David Jones v. Paul Butler, Jr.
as 16-6001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID EARL JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL G. BUTLER, JR., WILLIS J. FOWLER, ANTHONY E. RAND and others
Defendant:
BEVERLY PERDUE and PATRICK L. MCCRORY
McDowell v. Butler et al
as 5:2015ct03304
Plaintiff:
Robert Henry McDowell
Defendant:
Paul G. Butler, Jr., Willis J. Fowler, Anthony E. Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaun Hayden v. Paul Butler, Jr.
as 15-7676
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHAUN ANTONIO HAYDEN
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL G. BUTLER, JR.
Defendant:
ALVIN KELLER, ROBERT C. LEWIS and ANTHONY E. RAND
Langley v. Butler et al
as 5:2015ct03274
Plaintiff:
Ferris R. Langley
Defendant:
Paul G. Butler, Jr., Willis J. Fowler, Anthony E. Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosby v. Harper et al
as 5:2015ct03233
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mosby
Defendant:
Julie Harper, Arron Johnson, George T. Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Chrzan, Jr. v. Paul Butler, Jr.
as 15-7378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN M. CHRZAN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL G. BUTLER, JR., Chairman, NC Parole Commission, WILLIS J. FOWLER, Commissioner, ANTHONY E. RAND, Commissioner and others
Defendant:
PATRICK L. MCCRORY, Governor and BEVERLY PERDUE
Gregory Jones v. Robert McKay
as 15-7302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT MCKAY, ANTHONY E. RAND, WILLIS J. FOWLER and others
Gregory Jones v. Robert McKay
as 15-7302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY HUDSON JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT MCKAY, ANTHONY E. RAND, WILLIS J. FOWLER and others
Dove v. Pate et al
as 5:2015ct03132
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dove
Defendant:
Imelda J. Pate, Paul L. Jones, Ripley E. Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Butler et al
as 5:2014ct03142
Plaintiff:
David Earl Jones
Defendant:
Paul G. Butler, Jr., Willis J. Fowler, Anthony E. Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
