Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Moore v. Cardinal Financial Company, L.P. et al
as 1:2012cv01824
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Moore
Defendant:
Cardinal Financial Company, L.P., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., E & W Realty, LLC and others
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Mark McBurney v. Nathaniel Young
as 11-1099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK J. MCBURNEY and ROGER W. HURLBERT
Plaintiff:
BONNIE STEWART, Professor
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHANIEL L. YOUNG, Deputy Commissioner and Director, Division of Child Support Enforcement, Commonwealth of Virginia and THOMAS C. LITTLE, Real Estate Assessment Division, Henrico County, Commonwealth of Virginia
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Virginia and SAMUEL A. DAVIS, Real Estate Assessment Division, Henrico County, Commonwealth of Virginia
Amicus Curiae:
THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEWS EDITORS, ASSOCIATION OF CAPITOL REPORTERS AND EDITORS and others
CHESTER COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL v. W. et al
as 2:2009cv02394
Plaintiff:
CHESTER COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL
Defendant:
E. W., SR. and D. M.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Appeal From The Decision Of The Special Education Appeals Panel (IDEIA)
Payless Shoesource, Inc. v. Avalon Funding Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv04744
Plaintiff:
Payless Shoesource, Inc.
Defendant:
Avalon Funding Corporation, Empire Construction, E&M Mechanical and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America et al v. Creftcon Industries et al
as 2:2007cv07812
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant:
Creftcon Industries, Environmental Lighting for Architectuve, Inc., E. W. Smith Chemical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
In Re: Request from Latvia
as 1:2007mc00107
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
E & W Trading Group L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
