Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Thomas v. City of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Oscar Thomas
Defendant:
Bay St. Louis Police Department, Rachel Jewell, Steven Lee Saucier and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rollins et al v. Fitts et al
as 1:2018cv00198
Plaintiff:
Jason Rollins and Eric Powell
Defendant:
Edward Fitts and E & J Tours, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens et al v. Amerson et al
as 3:2015cv00151
Plaintiff:
Tony Stevens, Joe L. Amerson, Jr. and Tommy J. Goree
Defendant:
Andrew Howorth, Jim Hood, Larry E. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaurin et al v. Church Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv00235
Plaintiff:
Walter D. McLaurin , Charles Magee , Elbert McLaurin and others
Defendant:
Church Mutual Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Church Mutual Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
E. J. Flowers , Charles Magee , Elbert McLaurin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sanders v. Mitchell
as 3:2013cv00910
Plaintiff:
Ralph Sanders
Defendant:
E. J. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Mitchell
as 4:2012cv00191
Plaintiff:
Ralph Sanders
Defendant:
E. J. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Hood et al
as 2:2011cv00172
Plaintiff:
Christy Taylor
Defendant:
Jim Hood , E. J. Mitchell and Lisa Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Winding v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Ownership of "EMCF, F.B.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Hood et al
as 2:2011cv00062
Plaintiff:
Christy Taylor
Defendant:
Jim Hood , E. J. Mitchell , Lamar County Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
