Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ELLIOTT v. AMAZON.COM, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03792
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLIOTT
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., INTERTEK USA, INC., INTERTEK CALEB BRETT and others
Cross Defendant:
ABC MAINTENANCE COMPANY (IES) 1-5 and HANGZHOU OU YUE E-COMMERCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Nifty Home Products Inc v. Ladynana US, et al
as 23-2028
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NIFTY HOME PRODUCTS INC
Defendant:
LADYNANA US, ALL4UGOOD, CARB OMAR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHENZHEN RUIMIAOQIAN NETWORK TEHCNOLOGY LTD
Defendant / Appellant:
NAFXZY
Not Yet Classified:
YSZOOD, QUINTINA, FORTIOO and others
Not Classified By Court:
YUEDONG
Nifty Home Products Inc v. Ladynana US, et al
as 23-1332
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NIFTY HOME PRODUCTS INC
Defendant:
LADYNANA US, ALL4UGOOD, COLLECTIONS ETC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CARB OMAR, XUXUAIXUAIAI, YUEERXING and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SHENZHEN RUIMIAOQIAN NETWORK TEHCNOLOGY LTD
Not Classified By Court:
YUEDONG and PEYSAITR
REIFFER v. GLOBAL E-COMMERCE LEADERS FORUM, LLC
as 2:2018cv16973
Plaintiff:
PAUL REIFFER
Defendant:
GLOBAL E-COMMERCE LEADERS FORUM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
KING v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 5:2017cv05026
Plaintiff:
LAURETTA R. KING
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WALMART E-COMMERCE DISTRIBUTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
MARIMAR TEXTILES, INC. v. JUDE CLOTHING & ASSESSORIES CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv02900
Plaintiff:
MARIMAR TEXTILES, INC.
Defendant:
JUDE CLOTHING & ACCESSORIES CORPORATION, JUDE CONNALLY CLOTHING AND ACCESSORIES INC., JUDE CONNALLY E-COMMERCE CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BED BATH & BEYOND INC. et al v. GENEROUS GENIE et al
as 2:2007cv02105
Plaintiff:
BED BATH & BEYOND INC. and BED BATH & BEYOND PROCUREMENT CO. INC.
Defendant:
GENEROUS GENIE, REWARD AMAZON, VC E-COMMERCE SOLUTIONS NETWORK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
