Cases 1 - 10 of 278
Myers et al v. Kem et al
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
William Myers and Jack Myers
Defendant:
Charles E. Kem, Nancy Rhode, David Bryan Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanover Insurance Company v. Shively
as 9:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Hanover Insurance Company
Defendant:
Douglas E. Shively
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodie et al v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company et al
as 9:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Donald T. Rodie and Susan E. London
Defendant:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company and USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Covington v. Bludworth et al
as 6:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Covington
Defendant:
Peter Bludworth, Ms. Combs and W. Fuson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russ v. United States of America
as 9:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Brent E. Russ
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ulrich v. Bludworth et al
as 1:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
Dale E. Ulrich
Respondent:
Peter Bludworth and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shreves v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Shreves
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Crystal Thompson, Brian Gootkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.